- misère version of go problems
- slinky tangles (more seriously, links with secondary structure for alpha-helix protein folding)
- caesar cipher rotations: inspired by this which was probably mentioned on ACX or DSL
- Chebyshev machines with mindstorms
- multi focus version of ellipse (constant string length)
Wednesday, August 11, 2021
Monday, December 28, 2020
Putting this here for no particular reason.
Queen's Gambit: B+/B. Entertaining, with some issues.
The ending was too perfect, but we knew something like that would happen from nearly the first scene (as soon as we knew Borgov's name). I wonder if it would have been better with a slight twist: if the final game had been a legitimate draw. Probably the general audience doesn't know this, but it is (now) very common for top level chess matches to end with a draw. I'm not sure how common that was in the 60s.
To support that result, they probably would have had to lay a bunch of groundwork earlier. maybe a game with Shaibel that ends with a drawn position and he has to explain why it isn't worth continuing to play? As it is presented in the show, a draw is just a trick, when one player thinks they have lost, but they think the other player doesn't see how to win, then they offer a draw as a psychological play on the lack of confidence.
They did, eventually, address all my major issues (drugs, genius). Also, the way they set up the team support was well done. First, they show us that the soviet players are collaborating. The audience probably thinks that's cheating, but it serves to legitimize the support from the US players (which, as depicted, is pretty implausible, since it involves exactly the 6 serious male players who have appeared more than once). Then, during play, Borgov deviates from the ideas the team had considered, so we see that Beth actually does win "on her own."
By coincidence, I just read The Big Bounce, a novel from the 60s. One theme of that book was "women are bored and unsatisfied with life, have to turn to substances or craziness to occupy themselves." It is very condescending. Unfortunately, there were also echoes of that in TQG: Beth herself, the society girl from high school, Beth's bio and adoptive mothers, Cleo. Jolene and Packer(? the woman from the first chess tournament) are exceptions, but they don't get much screen time in those roles.
Perhaps would have been nice to see more of her bio mother. I didn't really understand what was going on with her, so maybe she was trapped. Didn't seem that there was anyone trapping Alma, the adoptive mother. There were nods to the idea of some generalized social pressure (the first Life interview, the society club high school student, the two women getting paired in the first tournament), but it was all pretty diffuse. For example, we didn't ever see any US Chess Federation opposition to Beth playing in the open division for the US championship.
Other misc thoughts:
(1) Beth's affection for Townes doesn't really ring true. Fine that she had a crush on him for a while, but I didn't buy that it was a deep love simmering for years and years.
(2) I didn't understand the lack of consistency in the post-sex scenes between Beltik and Benny. In the first, Beth is shown to be cold because she is immediately thinking about chess, but, in the second, she is shown not comprehending that Benny would immediately think of chess afterwards.
(3) Cleo says (and Beth seems to agree) that Benny is only in love with himself. While we definitely see that he thinks highly of himself, he has clearly gone out of his way to help Beth, for no discernible benefit to himself.
(4) The Cleo sabotage evening had several things that didn't sit well. First, Cleo knows that Beth has a big day ahead and completely undermines her. It was such an extreme degree that I almost thought there would be a reveal of Cleo getting paid off by the Russians or some other group opposed to Beth. Second, it shows Beth waking up in the bath. Could that possibly be a thing? If she were so unaware that she wouldn't notice the discomfort, wouldn't she drown?
Saturday, May 16, 2020
Tuesday, February 11, 2020
Graham Fletcher created a set of Progressions videos for various elementary school themes. J3 and I recently went back to his page and found he had a new(er than we knew) progression on early number and counting. Even for this simple topic, the video highlights some points we hadn't considered explicitly, for example distinguishing producers (of a number) and counters. Also, the cardinality point that smaller natural numbers are nested within larger numbers wasn't something we had talked about, but we soon realized it was part of many examples in how we understand numbers.
With that as inspiration, J3 and I decided to search for a range of examples of a single number, we chose 8, in different forms. There is at least one obvious version we're missing.
Add a comment (with picture, if you can) to show other forms of the number 8!
Marking 8 on the 100 board, an easy place to start:
8 beads on the abacus shows the relationships 3+5 = 8 and 10-2 = 8 (also 100- 92 = 8)
8 can hide in plain sight. Without labeling the three lengths, it would have been hard to recognize the longer one as 8 cm and, for you at home, impossible to know without reference to show the scale.
It happened that, within the precision of our scale, two chocolate wrapped chocolate bars were 8 oz (2x3.5 oz of chocolate + about half an ounce of wrapping for each):
8 cups of water ended up being a lot, so this version unintentionally revealed a relationship 4 + 2 + 2 = 8
Though I'm not sure I can articulate why or show supporting research, I feel it is very valuable to build experience with physical models of numbers to create familiarity and intuition about what they are/mean. In particular, I hope this helped J3 anchor the importance of units of measure and scale in the interpretation of numbers.
Finally, this construction has nothing to do with the number 8 (or does it???)
Thursday, May 30, 2019
- NRICH activities and games: https://nrich.maths.org/primary
- Peter Liljedahl numeracy tasks: http://www.peterliljedahl.com/teachers/numeracy-tasks. Despite the dull name, the activities are good for catalyzing interesting discussions. His card trick videos were really good with my sons: http://www.peterliljedahl.com/teachers/card-tricks
- We’ve gotten a lot of mileage from the Beast Academy books: https://beastacademy.com/books. The problems are thoughtful and there’s usually one or two problems in each block that is a good inspiration for a conversation or deeper exploration.
- More prep time, in increasing order of advanced time required
- http://mathpickle.com/: the puzzles and games are very good.
- Math Teachers at Play blog carnivals: https://denisegaskins.com/mtap/. Variable amounts of prep time, but usually there’s at least one activity that is ripe for exploration, may take a bit of reading through the carnival to find a suitable one.
- Mike's Lawler's blog: wonderful collection of (mostly) videos of his family working through problems, puzzles and mathematical explorations. Because his kids are older, it will take a little time to find something you think is suited for your son and then a bit to organize the activity.
- Georgia State math standards: Despite the name "standards," these documents have a full curriculum with a collection of really great activities. As with any full curriculum, not everything is a complete winner, but there are enough gems. Also, this is probably the best resource for finding material to complement a kid's weaknesses.
Friday, August 3, 2018
Fake Math Models
Robert Kaplinsky wrote a note recently discussing fake math models and unnecessary context. This prompted an activity with the kids.
This issue seems to have come up a lot recently, so I've noticed a pattern: I really hate bad contexts.
Robert wrote: "it looks like the context is completely unnecessary to do all of the problems."
I would go farther: this context is harmful. The context creates a conflict between the specific new material (rational vs irrational numbers) and other important concepts (measurement and measurement error). Subtly, we are discouraging students from
(a) forming connections across topics. For my taste, surprising connections has to be one of the most beautiful and delightful aspects of math.
(b) using all of their ideas and creativity to understand a challenge.
(c) putting new mathematical ideas into a broader mathematical context (maybe I'm just repeating point a?)
I admit that the example only touches on these points lightly, but I suspect the accumulated weight over the course of a school math education is substantial.
If I were full-time in a classroom with a textbook, I'd be tempted to use it as follows:
1. create censored versions of all problems and examples (as you did)
2. work through the questions with the kids
3. Ask them what context they think the publishers originally included and why
4. show the published version
5. discuss (does the published version relate to the math, does it help them understand, does it add confusion, does it conflict with something they know, etc)
Tuesday, July 24, 2018
- 119 is the number to call for emergency services... in parts of Asia (wiki reference).
- Of course, 119 backwards is 911 which is the US emergency services phone number
- 119 is aspiring, the sequence formed by summing proper factors ends with a perfect number.
- 119 isn't prime, but it almost feels like it
- 119 = 7 x 17. I don't think products of consecutive primes ending in 7 has a name, but maybe it should?
MiscellaneousAperiodical has an article from Benjamin Leis on the Big Internet Math-off.
Cathy O'Neil tells her mathematician origin story. I hope all our kids can have an empowering math experience like this.
Discussion of a "square dancing" puzzle from Mike Lawler: part 1 and part 2. I think there is a lot more to explore here and hope some of you will write parts 3 and beyond...
Middle schoolHave you been waiting for someone to write the perfect post giving you an introduction to tons of Desmos activities? Well, Mary Bourrasa has done it for you.
Michael Pershan tweeted a pointer to a nice collection of logic puzzles on puzzling stackexchange.
This segues directly into a review of two number theory books by Ben Leis (also the author of the Big Internet Math off post above) in which he discusses some other visualizations beyond factor trees:
The Scientific American Blog has been running these columns on "my favorite theorem." Go back and take a look (I think this was their first one): Amie Wilkinson's favorite theorem.